ABSTRACT
Aim To explore the impact of coronavirus-2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic on emergency reper-fusion characteristics in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from non-epicenter. Methods This was a retrospective study involved STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), who admitted to chest pain center in our hospital during the pandemic ( from January 23 to March 29 in 2020) and the same period in 2019, excluding the patients with COVID-19. Clinical characteristics and reperfusion parameters were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 64 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI were enrolled in our study, including 13 patients during the pandemic and 51 patients during the same period in 2019. No differences occurred in admission signs, GRACE scores, arrival periods, transferred patterns,the period from door to troponin,and the period from first medical contact to dual antiplatelet between the two groups ( P>0. 05). As compared with 2019, STEMI patients undergoing PPCI had an apparent reduction. Meanwhile, significant delays appeared in reperfusion parameters, in-cluding the period from symptom onset to first medical contact (10 h vs. 3. 0 h, P<0. 001), the period from first medical contact to electrocardiogram (6 min vs. 3 min, P<0. 001), the period from door to troponin (15 min vs. 12 min, P = 0. 048), the period from door to device (76 min vs. 62 min, P = 0. 017), the period from telephone to catheter activated (15 min vs. 5 min, P<0. 001) and the period from catheter arrival to device (52 min vs. 41 min, P = 0. 033). Conclusion Even in non-epicenter, the COVID-19 outbreak still delayed mechanical reperfusion significantly. © 2022, Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Arteriosclerosis. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events including acute myocardial infarction due to a prothrombotic and hypercoagulable status, and endothelial dysfunction. Case report: We report the case of a 62-year-old women, admitted to the hospital via the emergency room for acute chest pain and dyspnea. A nasopharyngeal swab was positive for COVID19 real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction 11 day ago. On admission, she was hypotensive with systolic blood pressure measering 87 mmHg and tachycardic with 117 beats/min, oxygen saturation (SO2) was 94%. An 18-lead ECG revealed an infero-postero-lateral ST-elevation myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement and a seconddegree- Mobitz Type 1 atrioventricular block. The coronary angiography from the right femoral artery showed acute thrombotic occlusion of the first diagonal branch with TIMI 0 flow and acute thrombotic occlusion of proximal right coronary artery with TIMI 0 flow. The most likely diagnosis was myocardial infarction secondary to a non-atherosclerotic coronary occlusion. The angioplasy was performed with dilatations with a semi compliant balloon, bailout implant of BMS, manual thrombus aspiration and intracoronary injection of tirofiban in the right coronary artery. The myocardial revascularization was ineffective. The patient developed significant severe hemodynamic instability and cardiac arrest for pulseless electric activity after 24 hours. Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 outbreak implies deep changes in the clinical profile and therapeutic management of STEMI patients who underwent PCI. At present, the natural history of coronary embolism is not well understood;however, the cardiac mortality rate are hight. This suggests these patients require further study to identify the natural history of the condition and to optimize management to improve outcome.
ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019, also known as the COVID-19 pandemic has had a deleterious impact on daily living, with health and socioeconomic effects of a global magnitude. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), an important cardiovascular disease with significant morbidity and mortality rates, has been frequently reported in patients with this novel virus. This review aims to discuss the potential associations between COVID-19 and ACS with the use of multiple databases, including but not limited to; PubMed, ScienceDirect, World Health Organization, and American Heart Association. We have explored the pathophysiology of ACS, focusing on COVID-19 in particular with the use of various works of literature that highlights the pattern of viral entry and replication via the angiotensin-converting enzyme II. The review has also discussed the impact of the pandemic on hospital admissions, diagnosis, and management of ACS patients, as well as briefly highlighted a possible link between the widely available COVID-19 vaccines and possible cardiovascular complications. The association between COVID-19 and ACS needs more in-depth studies to help establish whether there exists a direct causal and or inciting correlation between them. Understanding this association might lead to new research and treatment options for ACS patients.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Data on the incidence of type 2 NSTEMI (T2MI) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection has been limited to single-center studies. We propose to define the incidence of T2MI in a national cohort and identify pre-hospital patient characteristics associated with a diagnosis of T2MI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We will also examine the impact of T2MI on morbidity and mortality. Method(s): We performed a retrospective analysis on data from the American Heart Association COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Quality Improvement Registry. This national registry contains data on tens of thousands of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from at least 122 centers across the United States. From January 2020 through May 2021, there were 709 (2.2%) out of 32,015 patients with a coded diagnosis of T2MI. We performed Wilcoxon tests, chi-squared test, and multivariable logistic regression to (1) identify predictive pre-hospital patient characteristics (Table 1) of T2MI for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and (2) investigate the impact of T2MI on mortality and morbidity. Result(s): Patients in the T2MI group were older (71 vs. 63 years, p<0.001), and in forward selection analyses, patients with a diagnosis of T2MI had higher odds of known HTN (OR 1.79 [1.01-3.1], p=0.026) and heart failure (OR 3.46 [2.24-5.34], p<0.001). Increased age, admission troponin, CRP, and d-dimer were also associated with higher odds of T2MI. Hispanic race (OR 0.517 [0.289-0.924], p=0.026) and use of antihyperglycemics (OR 0.562 [0.377-0.836], p=0.005) were both associated with lower odds of T2MI. T2MI led to increased mortality (HR 1.32, [1.17-1.5], P<0.001) and morbidity including cardiac arrest, major bleeding, and stroke. Conclusion(s): A history of heart failure was the strongest predictor of T2MI in hospitalized COVID19 patients. Patients with a T2MI compared to those without, had significantly higher mortality and morbidity. Limitations include the heterogenous ascertainment of the T2MI diagnosis across sites in this registry.
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 385 papers. The topics discussed include: racial and ethnic differences in the population burden of dementia attributable to modifiable risk factors in the United States;higher visit-to-visit variability in fasting glucose and HbA1c is associated with decline in global cognitive performance: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA);prevalence of stroke symptoms among Hispanic/Latino adults in the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL);educational attainment and dementia risk: mediation by vascular risk factors at mid-life in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study;a healthy plant-based diet was associated with slower cognitive decline in African Americans: a biracial community-based cohort of older adults;outcome preferences related to cardiovascular preventive therapies in older adults: an online survey;subclinical myocardial injury, coagulopathy, and inflammation in Covid-19: a meta-analysis;COVID-19 and type II NSTEMI: a comprehensive overview;association of antecedent statin use with outcomes of people with Covid-19 admitted at northwestern medicine health system;and social determinants of health and ambulatory outcomes among Covid-19 positive patients: differences by race/ethnicity.
ABSTRACT
Aim. To study clinical and anamnestic data, as well as inhospital outcomes in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared with previously uninfected STEMI patients. Material and methods. This prospective study included 181 patients treated for STEMI. The patients were divided into 2 groups, depending on the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titer as follows: the main group included 62 seropositive patients, while the control group - 119 seronegative patients without prior COVID-19. Anamnesis, clinical and paraclinical examination, including electrocardiography, echocardiography, coronary angiography, were performed. Mortality and incidence of STEMI complications at the hospital stage were analyzed. Results. The mean age of the patients was 62,6+/-12,3 years. The vast majority were men (69,1% (n=125)). The median time from the onset of COVID-19 manifestations to STEMI was 60,00 [45,00;83,00] days. According to, the patients of both groups were comparable the severity of circulatory failure (p>0,05). Coronary angiography found that in patients of the main group, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score of 0-1 in the infarct-related artery was recorded much less frequently (62,9% (n=39) vs, 77,3% (n=92), p=0,0397). Patients of the main group demonstrated a lower concentration of leukocytes (9,30*109/l [7,80;11,40] vs 10,70*109/l [8,40;14,00], p=0,0065), higher levels of C-reactive protein (21,5 mg/L [9,1;55,8] vs 10,2 mg/L [5,1;20,5], p=0,0002) and troponin I (9,6 ng/mL [2,2;26,0] vs 7,6 ng/mL [2,2;11,5], p=0,0486). Lethal outcome was recorded in 6,5% (n=4) of cases in the main group and 8,4% (n=10) in the control group (p=0,6409). Both groups were comparable in terms of the incidence of complications (recurrent myocardial infarction, ventricular fibrillation, complete atrioventricular block, stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding) during hospitalization (p>0,05). Conclusion. Patients with STEMI after COVID-19, despite a more burdened history and higher levels of C-reactive protein and troponin I, compared with STEMI patients without COVID-19, did not differ significantly in clinical status, morbidity, and inhospital mortality.Copyright © 2023, Silicea-Poligraf. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: It has been previously reported during the first COVID outbreak that patients presenting with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) and concurrent COVID-19 infection have increased thrombus burden and poorer outcomes [1]. Subsequently, there have been multiple further waves of the pandemic with the emergence of at least two new COVID-19 variants and the emergence of vaccinations. To-date, there have been no reports comparing the outcomes of COVID-19-positive STEMI patients across all waves of the pandemic. Purpose(s): The purpose of this study was to compare the baseline demographic, procedural and angiographic characteristics alongside the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with STEMI and concurrent COVID-19 infection across the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Method(s): This was a single-centre, observational study of 1250 consecutive patients admitted with confirmed STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Barts Heart Centre between 01/03/2020 and 10/03/2022. COVID +ve patients were split into 3 groups based upon the time course of the pandemic (Wave 1: March 2020-June 2020, Wave 2: Sept 2020-March 2021, Wave 3: October 2021-March 2022). Comparison was made between waves and with a control group of COVID-ve patients treated during the same timeframe. Result(s): A total of 135 COVID +ive patients with STEMI (1st Wave: 39 patients, 2nd Wave: 60 patients, 3rd wave 35 pts) were included in the present analysis;and compared with 1115 COVID negative patients. Significant changes in the baseline characteristics, angiographic features and clinical outcomes of COVID +ive patients occurred over time. Early during the pandemic (Wave 1 2020), STEMI patients presenting with concurrent COVID-19 infection had high rates of cardiac arrest, evidence of increased thrombus burden (higher rates of multi-vessel thrombosis, stent thrombosis, higher modified thrombus grade higher use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombus aspiration, coagulability (more heparin for therapeutic ACT), bigger infarcts (lower myocardial blush grade and left ventricular function) and worse outcomes (mortality). However, by wave 3 (late 2021/2022), no differences existed in clinical characteristics, thrombus burden, infarct size or outcomes between COVID +ive patients and those without concurrent COVID-19 infection with significant differences compared to earlier COVID +ve patients. Poor outcomes later in the study period were predominantly in unvaccinated individuals. Conclusion(s): Significant changes have occurred in the clinical characteristics, angiographic features and outcomes of STEMI patients with COVID- 19 infection treated by primary PCI during the course of the pandemic. Importantly it appears that angiographic features and outcomes of recent waves are no different to a non-COVID-19 population.
ABSTRACT
Background: Delayed door-to-balloon (DTB) time and deterioration of inhospital mortality during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have been reported. Little is known about the impact of changes in in-hospital medical management before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for COVID-19 such as screening test (antigen or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, chest CT for excluding the pneumoniae) and primary PCI under full personal protective equipment (PPE) on DTB time and in-hospital mortality. Purpose(s): The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of inhospital medical management for COVID-19 on DTB time and in-hospital mortality during COVID-19 pandemic period. Method(s): We compared DTB time and in-hospital mortality of 502 STelevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients during COVID-19 pandemic (February 2020 and January 2021) with 2035 STEMI patients before pandemic (February 2016 and January 2020) using date from Mie ACS registry, a retrospective and multicenter registry. Result(s): The COVID-19 screening tests before primary PCI and/or primary PCI under full PPE was performed on 173/502 (34.5%) patients (antigen or PCR tests;39 (7.8%), chest CT;156 (31.3%), full PPE;11 (2.2%)). These patients had lower rate of achievement of DTB time <=90 min compared with others (Figure 1A). Moreover, In-hospital management of COVID-19 screening tests and/or primary PCI under full PPE was an independent factor of DTB time>90 min with odds ratio of 1.94 (95% confidential interval: 1.37-2.76, p<0.001). In addition, in-hospital mortality of those patients was higher compared with others (Figure 1B). Conclusion(s): In-hospital medical management for COVID-19 screening tests before primary PCI and/or primary PCI under full PPE was the independent factor of DTB time>90 min. This study reinforces the need to focus efforts on shortening DTB time, while controlling the epidemic of infection.
ABSTRACT
Clinical Information Patient Initials or Identifier Number: SHS Relevant Clinical History and Physical Exam: Mr. SHS was admitted in August 2022 for acute decompensated heart failure secondary to NSTEMI, complicated with ventricular tachycardia (VT). CPR was performed for6 minutes on the day of admission and was subsequently transferred to the Cardiac Care Unit. His hospital stay was complicated with Covid-19 infection(category 2b) which he recovered well from. During admission, he developed recurrent episodes of angina. Physical examination was otherwise unremarkable. His ejection fraction was 45%. Relevant Catheterization Findings: Cardiac catheterization was performed, which revealed significant calcification of left and right coronary arteries. There was a left main stem bifurcation lesion (Medina 0,1,1) with subtotal occlusion over ostial the LAD, receiving collaterals from RCA and 90% stenosis over ostial LCx. RCA was dominant, heavily calcified with no significant stenosis. He was counselled for CABG (Syntex score26) but refused. As he was symptomatic, he was planned for PCI to the left coronary system. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] Interventional Management Procedural Step: The left main was engaged with a 7F EBU 3.5guiding catheter via transradial approach. Sion Blue wired into LAD and LCx. IVUS catheter couldn't cross the LAD and LCx lesions, hence we decided for up front rotational atherectomy. Sion blue was exchanged to Rotawire with the assistance of Finecross microcatheter. A 1.5mm burr was used at 180000 rpm. After the first run of rotablation, patient developed chest pain and severe hypotension (BP ranging 50/30). 4 inotropes/vasopressors were commenced. The shock was refractory hence an intraarterial balloon pump was inserted. Symptoms and blood pressure improved. Another 2 runs of atherectomy done (patient developed hypotension after each run). IVUS examination then showed calcification of proximal to mid LAD with an IVUS Calcium score of 3. LAD was further predilated with Scoreflex balloon 3.0/20mm at 8-22ATM. LCx was predilated with Scoreflex balloon 2.0/15mm at 12-14ATM. DCB Sequent Please NEO2.0/30mm was deployed at 7ATM at ostial to proximal LCx. Proximal to mid LAD was stented with Promus ELITE 2.5/32mm at 11ATM, which was then post dilated with stent balloon at 11ATM. Ostial LM to proximal LAD (overlap) was stented with Promus ELITE 4.0/28mm at 11ATM. LMS POT was then done with NC Balloon 4.0/15mm at 24ATM. LCx was rewired and kissing balloon technique with NC balloon 4.0/15mm at 14ATM (LAD) and NC balloon 2.0/10mm at 12ATM (LCx) was done, followed by a final POT with NC balloon 4.0/15mm at 14ATM. Final IVUS showed good MSA. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): This patient developed hemodynamic instability with each rotational atherectomy run, hence we decided not to perform rotablation to the circumflex artery. His hemodynamic condition improved with the use of intra aortic balloon pump. IABP use can reduce procedural event rate and potentially reduce long term mortality in appropriately selected patients who are at high risk of adverse events. He was followed up a month following the procedure and remained asymptomatic. For complex, calcified coronary lesions involving the left main stem, coronary artery bypass graft surgery is an alternative option.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Widely considered safe, effective, and essential for pathogenic immunity, vaccines have proven to be one of the most important discoveries to date in medicine. Adverse reactions to vaccines are typically trivial but there have been extremely rare reports of vaccine induced myocarditis, particularly with the Tdap vaccine. This is thought to be due to a hypersensitivity reaction. In efforts to combat the SARS-CoV-2, prompt response from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna lead to vaccine development with a novel method, synthesized from modified messenger RNA. Despite minimal side effects on initial trials, reports of vaccine induced myocarditis have resulted. A majority of these cases occurred following subsequent doses for those previously inoculated. A descriptive study published in JAMA in January 2022 reviewed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in collaboration with the CDC described only 1626 cases of myocarditis, of which the majority occurred within days of the second dose. This review was limited by reviewing a passive reporting syndrome with variable quality data and without follow up data post diagnosis of myocarditis. Here we present a case of myocarditis occurring less than 24 hours after the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine with 3 month follow up. A 23 year old man received his second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in the morning. Within a few hours he experienced chest pain, chills, weakness, and fatigue. These dissipated by 7pm. He is a member of the National Guard and during drills the next day experienced stabbing substernal chest pain for which he sought evaluation. The pain radiated into his left jaw, worse with deep inspiration and worse in the left lateral decubitus position. He is a 1 PPD smoker with no personal or family history or cardiac disease. A friction rub was heard on physical exam. His troponin I peaked at 2.6ng/mL. His EKG showed normal sinus rhythm, a TTE showed a normal EF with no pericardial effusion. He was given aspirin 81 mg and started on a heparin drip for possible NSTEMI. The next day his pain decreased and a cardiac MRI demonstrated no inflammation. His serum coxsackie and parvovirus titers were negative. He was instructed to continue the aspirin, limit exercise for 8 weeks, and stop smoking. Upon follow up 3 months later the patient denied any recurrent chest pain and was advised to continue the aspirin. But the original bout of myocarditis limited his participation in the National Guard. Our case illustrates that exposure to an immunological trigger, the COVID-19 vaccine, leading to myocarditis was extremely short compared to typical cases of viral induced or vaccine hypersensitivity reaction. A proposed mechanism is molecular mimicry between the spike protein and myocardial contraction proteins. It also demonstrates that the vaccine can cause morbidity in patients, especially younger males. It also exemplifies that this may be a short lived phenomenon, long term follow up is still needed. With the rate of vaccination increasing, there needs to be a low threshold to consider myocarditis in young adults who have new chest pain after receiving an mRNA based vaccine.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to extensive restrictions in Germany in 2020, including the postponement of elective interventions. We examined the impact on ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as an acute and non-postponable disease. Method(s): Using German national records, all STEMI between 2017 and 2020 were identified. Using the number of STEMI cases between 2017 and 2019, we created a forecast for 2020 using poisson regression models and compared it with the observed number of STEMI in 2020. Result(s): From 2017 to 2020, 248,062 patients were treated for a STEMI in Germany. Mean age was 65.21 years and 28.36% were female. When comparing forecasted and observed STEMI in 2020, a correlation can be seen: Noticeably fewer STEMI were treated in those weeks respectively months with an increasing COVID-19 hospitalization rate (monthly percentage decrease in STEMI: March -14.85% April -13.39%, November -11.92%, December -22.95%). At the same time, the risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality increased significantly at the peaks of the first and second waves (monthly in-hospital mortality: April RR=1.11 [95% CI 1.02;1.21], November 1.13 [1.04;1.24], December 1.16 [1.06;1.27]). Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 pandemic led to a noticeable decrease in the number of STEMI interventions in Germany at the peaks of the first and second waves in 2020, corresponding to an increase in COVID-19 hospitalizations. At the same time, in-hospital mortality after STEMI increased significantly in these phases. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had influenced the patient's behavior and impacted the homeostasis to a pro-thrombotic niveau. Aim(s): The study aimed to follow the impact of COVID-19 on the incidence and prognosis of cardiogenic shock complicated initially acute myocardial infarction (CS-AMI). Method(s): We used data entered into a large national all-comers registry of coronary intervention over five years. From 1/2016 to 12/2020, 50,745 AMI patients were included, and 2,822 (5.6%) initially had CS. Result(s): The incidence of CS-AMI was significantly higher in the COVID period (2020) than the mean incidence in 2016-2019 (5.5% vs 6%, p=0.032). The difference was caused by significant increase of CS in acute STEMI (7.6% vs. 8.7%, p=0.011);it was 7.1% in 2016, 7.8% (2017), 7.6% (2018), 7.8% (2019), and 8.7% (2020). The CS complicated 2.3% (2016), 2.7% (2017), 2.7% (2018), 2.8% (2019), and 2.8% (2020) of NSTEMI. The observed rise in CS-STEMI incidence each month during the pandemic compared to the average incidence in non-pandemic years correlated with the substantial increase in the number of COVID infected/ hospitalized (Table 1). In these months, no changes in time delay to reperfusion layout were observed in CS-STEMI patients (Table 2). Except of less frequent history of previous PCI (13.9% and 8.2%, p<0.001), we found no significant differences in the followed CS-STEMI patient characteristics in 2016-2019 and 2020;men 72.7% and 75.4% (p=0.1), mean age (SD) 66.3 (12.3)yrs and 66.3 (12.2) yrs, Diabetes 20.9% and 19.1% (p=0.2), CKD 5.4% and 5.7% (p=0.4), previous CABG 4.5 and 4.2% (p=0.5), left main disease (14.3% and 16%, p=0.5), one vessel disease 24.9% and 32.1% (p=0.9), pre-PCI TIMI flow 0 64.4% and 66.2% (p=0.6), post-PCI TIMI flow 3 76.7% and 76.9%. The COVID pandemic didn't influence the proportions of pre-hospital resuscitated CS-AMI patients (57.5% and 58.7%, p=0.6) and those on mechanical ventilation (67.8% and 68.3%, p=0.8). The 30-day mortality trend of CS-AMI was 53.7% in 2016, 51.6% (2017), 49.7% (2018), 49.3% (2019), and 47.9% (2020). And in CS-STEMI it was 50.8%, 47.1%, 46.4%, 44.1%, and 45.3% (P2019 vs. 2020 =0.8), respectively. Conclusion(s): Data from a large national all-comer registry showed an increase in the proportion of patients admitted to hospitals with STEMI complicated by CS in the year of the COVID pandemic. The CS rise correlated with the increase in the COVID infected population. Factors other than the patient's cardiovascular risk profile or prolongation of a time delay to reperfusion influenced this trend. We suggest that the availability of health care and patient adherence may have affected the risks control. We did not observe any effect of the pandemic on CS-AMI mortality. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: During COVID-19 pandemic, the pattern of hospital admissions for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been changing, and increased mortality and morbidity is being noted in these patients. Patient may present with acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis simulating a presentation like STEMI, coronary spasm, myocardial injury not fulfilling the criteria of type 1 & type 2 acute MI and cardiomyopathy. In this study we have tried to determine some important differences among the patients presented with STEMI during The COVID-19 pandemic versus non-COVID-19 era. Method(s): This prospective observational study was carried out in National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute from 8thMarch,2019 to 7th March, 2021. Total 2531 patients were included. The study populations were divided into two groups. Group I: Acute STEMI patients presenting during pre COVID period (n=1385). Group II: Acute STEMI patients presenting during COVID period (n=1146). COVID period was calculated from 8th march, 2020 onward as first case of COVID -19 was detected on that day in Bangladesh. All patients presented with Acute STEMI was included in the study however NSTEMI-ACS, Unstable angina were excluded from the study. Result(s): Male was predominant in both groups. Regarding risk factors Hypertension, Obesity and family H/O of CAD was statistically significant (p<0.05). Acute STEMI patients presented lately during COVID-19 period probably due to lock down& lack of transport facility. Regarding coronary artery disease severity, vessel score was more during COVID period. SV-CAD were more during pre COVID period while DV-CAD & TV-CAD were more during COVID period. Gensini score was also calculated among the study populations, it was 57.21+/-28.42 and 63.16+/- 40.43respectively in group I and group I, which was statistically significant. Regarding treatment options of the patients, primary PCI was less during COVID period, however medical management, elective PCI and Thrombolysis were more during COVID era. Regarding in hospital outcome, acute LVF, cardiogenic shock were more during COVID period which were also statistically significant. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): During COVID -19, STEMI patients presented lately in comparison to pre COVID period. Coronary artery Disease were more severe during COVID period as evaluated by Vessel Score & Gensini Score. During COVID -19 period majority of patients got medical management& routine PCI were done more in comparison to primary PCI. In Hospital outcome of STEMI was worse during COVID-19 period in terms of acute LVF & cardiogenic shock. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction and aim: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has substantial impact on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) clinical course and outcome. In Poland during early phase of COVID-19 pandemic a network of dedicated hospitals was set to treat SARS-Cov2 positive patients. There is scarce data on STEMI patients outcome treated in this setting. Our aim was to compare outcomes of STEMI patients treated with primary PCI in hospitals dedicated to treat COVID-19 and referral high volume haemodynamic centres. Method(s): Study was a retrospective analysis of 115 consecutive COVID- 19 patients with STEMI, treated with primary PCI, admitted to 4 high volume centres (2 referral hospitals and 2 COVID dedicated sites) in southern Poland between May 2020 and November 2021. Data was obtained from patients' electronic medical records. Result(s): Detailed characteristics are presented in Table 1 and 2. In general in all hospitals, patients were similar in terms of age (median 69 y.o., IQR: 60-73), with similar profile of comorbidities. All patients used acetylsalicylic acid and unfractioned heparin. In referral centres, as compared with COVID-19 dedicated sites, there was a higher use of mechanical thrombectomy (p<0.001) and adenosine (p<0.001). Overall mortality rate was higher in COVID-19 centres (50% vs 25%, p=0.008). Detailed results are presented in Table 3. Conclusion(s): There is a significantly higher mortality in COVID patients who develop STEMI than in patients with STEMI who were tested positive on admission. Patients in COVID-19 hospitals had higher levels of CRP and NT-proBNP at baseline. There are substantial differences in treatment of patients in referral centres and COVID dedicated hospitals. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: Treating acute STEMI patients by primary PCI has dramatically fallen globally in covid era as there is chances of potential threat of spreading Covid among the non-Covid patient. Thereby, thrombolysis of acute STEMI patient either by Streptokinase (STK) or Tenecteplase (TNK) in grey zone till Covid RT PCR report to come, was the mode of treatment of acute myocardial infarction patient in our hospital. Post thrombolysis, Covid positive cases were managed conservatively in a Covid dedicated unit. Covid negative cases were treated by rescue PCI of the culprit lesion. Exact data on benefit of thrombolysis either by TNK or STK of STEMI patients in Covid era, is not well addressed in our patient population. Thereby, we have carried out this prospective observational study to see the outcomes of thrombolysis and subsequent intervention. Method(s): STEMI Patient who represented to our ER with chest pain and ECG and hs-TROP-I evidenced acute ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), were enrolled in the study. Total 139 patients enrolled (Male:120, Female :19);average age for Male: 54yrs., female was: 56yrs. All patients were admitted in the grey zone of CCU where thrombolysis done either by TNK or STK. Positive for COVID-19, were patients excluded from intervention and managed conservatively in Covid-19 dedicated ward. Covid Negative patients were kept transferred to CCU green zone. Result(s): COVID-19 test was carried out on all studied patients. Among them, Covid-19 positive were 7.9% (11) patients and managed conservatively in dedicated Covid ward, Covid-19 negative were 92.1% (128). Primary PCI was performed in 5.03% (7). Rest was managed by Pharmacoinvasive therapy either by TNK or STK. Thrombolysis by Tenecteplase in 64% (89), Streptokinase in 17.9% (25) patient, 12.9% (18) patient did not receive any thrombolysis due to late presentation and primary PCI done in 5.4% (7). On average 2.1 days after Fibrinolysis, elective PCI carried out. Data analysis from 48 patients;chest pain duration (3.71 +/-2.8 hr., Chest pain to contact time 3.3+/-2.8hr., Chest pain to needle time 7.2 +/-12.7hr., thrombolysis to balloon time 117.5+/-314.8hr., as many of the patient develop LVF post thrombolysis. More than 50% stenosis resolution observed in 41.6% (20) patients, chest pain resolution with one hour of thrombolysis observed in 43.8% (21) patients and development of LVF in 20.8% (10) patients. Door to needle time was 30 min. At presentation of STEMI;Ant Wall MI 46.8% (65), Inferior Wall MI 52.5% (73) and high Lateral 0.7% (1). Average Serum hs Trop-I was 16656 for male and 12109 for female. LVEF were 41% for male and 48% for female. HbA1C were in Male 8.34%: Female 8.05%, SBP for Male 120mmHg: Female 128 mmHg. Total, 88 stents were deployed in 83 territories. CABG recommended for 5.03% (7) patients, PCI in 58.3% (81), remaining were kept on medical management. Stented territory was LAD 45.7% (37) and RCA 39.5% (32) and LCX 14.8% (12). Common stent used;Everolimus 61.4% (54), Sirolimus 25% (22), Progenitor cell with sirolimus 2.3%(2) and Zotarolimus 11.4% (10) Conclusion(s): In the era of COVID-19, in this prospective cohort study, on acute STEMI patient management, we found that Pharmaco therapy by Tenecteplase and Streptokinase, reduced patient symptom and ST resolution partially. Therefore, coronary angiogram and subsequent Rescue PCI by Drug Eluting Stents (DES) are key goals of complete revascularization.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19 infection has been associated with acute myocardial dysfunction. However, long-term effects of myocardial injury during COVID-19 infection are not well characterized. Novel speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) may lend further insights into COVID-19 myocardial dysfunction. Method(s): Patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19 infection from March 2020 to September 2021 who underwent STE and had evidence of myocardial dysfunction (defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 55% and/or global longitudinal strain (GLS) less negative than -18%) were enrolled in follow-up 3-12 months after hospitalization. Clinical and laboratory data were collected, and follow-up STE was performed, including LVEF, GLS, myocardial work index (MWI) and myocardial work efficiency (MWE) measurements. Statistical analysis was performed to determine risk factors for worsening myocardial dysfunction at follow-up. Result(s): Twenty-four patients were enrolled at an average 239+/-102 days after the initial hospitalization echocardiogram: 13 (54%) male, 14 (58%) Black, and average age 56+/-14 years. Average duration of initial admission was 24+/-25 days;14 patients (58%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Ten (42%) patients had acute respiratory distress syndrome, 1 (4%) had ST-elevation myocardial infarction and 1 (4%) had cardiac arrest. Eleven (46%) patients required mechanical ventilation and 2 (8%) required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Five (21%) patients had elevated troponin on admission and average peak troponin was 1.35+/-3.83 ng/ml. Follow-up STE showed significant improvement in average GLS (-13.7+/-3.2% vs -16.0+/-3.7%, P=0.03). There were no significant changes in average LVEF (55.9+/-12.6% vs 55.5+/-8.8%, P=0.90), MWI (1519+/-425 vs 1681+/-412, P=0.24) and MWE (93+/-4 vs 92+/-4, P=0.65) at follow-up compared to during COVID-19 infection. Patients with lower LVEF at follow-up as compared to acute infection (n=11, 46%) were more likely to have had longer duration of symptoms prior to initial presentation (11+/-5 days vs 6+/-5 days, P=0.02) and higher peak erythrocyte sedimentation rate (94+/-30 mm/h vs 44+/-36 mm/h, P=0.007) compared to those with stable or improved LVEF. Conclusion(s): Approximately 8 months after COVID-19 infection, average GLS was significantly improved in patients with myocardial dysfunction during acute COVID-19 infection. Close follow-up is recommended for patients with evidence of myocardial injury during COVID-19 infection, especially those who present with prolonged symptoms and those with high inflammatory markers.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Background: The SWEDEHEART quality index of hospitals' adherence to the evidence-based (EB) guidelines for myocardial infarction (MI) patients has been continuously used for several decades in Sweden. The grading protocol is based on the consensus among hospitals. The hospitals are awarded points (0, 0.5, 1) for each of the 11 indicators depending on the proportion of patients who received EB treatment and achieved treatment goals. The 11 indicators at present are reperfusion treatment in STEMI (yes/no), time to-reperfusion treatment in STEMI, time to revascularisation in NSTEMI, P2Y12 antagonists at discharge, ACE-inhibitor/ARB at discharge, the proportion of patients at follow-up, smoking cessation at oneyear, participation in a physical exercise program, target LDL-cholesterol and target blood pressure at one year. Purpose(s): To evaluate whether the SWEDEHEART quality index predicts mortality in patients with MI. Method(s): We used data for all MI patients reported to the SWEDEHEART registry from 72 hospitals in Sweden between 2015-2021. We calculated the difference in quality index between 2021 and 2015. The hospitals were divided into quintiles based on the difference in the score. Logistic regression with log-time offset was used to adjust for confounders (age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, STEMI/NSTEMI, cardiac arrest before admission, occupation status, history of heart failure, prior MI, prior PCI, prior CABG, cardiogenic shock). Result(s): We identified 98,635 patients with MI, 32,608 (33.1%) were women and 34,198 (34.7%) had STEMI. The average age was 70.8+/-12.2 years. The median follow-up time was 2.7 years (IQR 1.06-4.63). The crude all-cause mortality rate was 5.5% at 30-days and 22.3% after longterm follow-up. Most hospitals (72.1%) improved their quality index on average by 3.4% per year (P<0.001). The increase in the quality index continued during COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) with average increase of 8.6%, 95% CI, 0.97-1.02;P<0.001. The median change in SWEDEHEART quality index score among the quintiles were -1.5 (Q1), 0,5 (Q2), 2,5 (Q3), 3 (Q4), and 4 (Q5). We found no difference in mortality between the quintiles at 30-days (OR 0.99;95% CI 0.97-1.02;p=1.02) and longterm (OR 1.01;95% CI 0,99-1.02;p=0.850). Conclusion(s): The SWEDEHEART quality index provides valuable descriptive information about hospitals' adherence to the guidelines. However, the index, in its current form, does not predict mortality in patients with MI.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: STEMI is one of the cardiac emergencies whose management has been mostly challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients presenting with the "lethal combo" of STEMI and concomitant SARS-CoV- 2 infection have faced dramatic issues related to need for self-isolation, systemic inflammation with multi-organ disease, and difficulties to obtain timely diagnosis and treatment. Method(s):We performed a systematic search of three electronic databases from February 1st 2020 to January 31st 2022. We included all studies reporting crude rates of in-hospital outcomes of STEMI patients with concomitant COVID-19. Result(s): A total of 9 observational studies were identified, mainly conducted during the first wave of the pandemic. STEMI patients with COVID -19 were more likely Afro-American and displayed higher rates of hypertension and diabetes with lower smoking prevalence. Associated comorbidities, including coronary artery disease, prior stroke and chronic kidney disease were also more common in those with SARS-CoV-2 infection. At coronary angiography, a higher thrombus burden in COVID-19 positive STEMI patients was highlighted, with up to 10-fold higher rates of stent thrombosis and greater need for glycoprotein IIb/IIa inhibitors and aspiration thrombectomy;this was not always associated with prolonged times from symptom onset to hospital admission and door-to-balloon. COVID-19 positive STEMI patients were less likely to receive coronary angiography and primary PCI, and more likely to be treated with fibrinolytics only. At the same time, patients with Covid-19 were more prone to present MINOCA. In-hospital mortality ranged from 15% to 40%, with consistent variability across different studies and subjects who tested positive for SARS-CoV- 2 did also present higher rates of cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, prolonged ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, major bleeding, and stroke. Conclusion(s): The coexistence of STEMI and COVID-19 was associated with increased in-hospital mortality and poor short-term prognosis. This was not entirely attributable to logistic issues determining delayed coronary revascularization, since patients' specific clinical and angiographic characteristics, including higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors and greater coronary thrombogenicity might have substantially contributed to this trend. (Figure Presented).